People are no better at thinking than
cattle. Three Great World Religions have been led by
cattle herders.
Is god Male or Female?
If you say male, I will ask "are you male chauvinistic?". Almost all religions are
xmale chauvinistic and refer to god as HIM never as HER.
If you say female, I will ask "are you female chauvinistic?".
If you say there is a male and a female god. I will ask "do they have any children?". That will bust
monotheism wide open.
If you say god is unisexual or non-sexual. I will ask "do you worship some thing that is inhuman?" or
"so man is not made in the image of god?".
If you say god is unisexual or non-sexual but man is a perverted image of god. I will ask "do you resent your
sexuality?"
If you say god is unknowable, I will ask "if god is unknowable how can you say that there is only one god?".
Religion breeds contempt for human life.
A person who follows religion thinks like this.
I am aligned with the only one true god. So since I am aligned with the true god
I can't do wrong. So the person who does not follow my religion
is doing wrong, so if he dies the world is all the more better off and good riddance.
Religion teaches you contempt for your parents and relatives and children.
If you and your family died suddenly and are standing before god for judgement,
and if god's servants are
dragging your mother or father or son or daughter away to hell, would you fight
god or meekly allow god the tyrant to drag your near and dear to hell, just so long
as you are sent to heaven? Would you question god's judgement and sanity or would you
say to yourself my mother must have offended god in some way so she deserves to be punished? Is
licking god's boots more important than standing by your mother and father?
God Corrupts
We all know that god is powerful.
If god is powerless would you worship god?
A powerless god is contradiction in terms.
So when you worship god you are worshipping power.
Power Corrupts. Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.
Since God=Power, God Corrupts, Absolute God Corrupts Absolutely.
Who created God B?
If you say that something as complex as the universe can't come into existence on its
own, therefore there must be a god who created it.
Then by your own argument something that can create a universe can't come into
existence on it's own, therefore there must be a God B who created God (A).
Who created God B? God C.
Who created God C? God D.
Who created God D? ... ... ... ... ...
If god can come into existence on its own, why couldn't something as powerful
as the universe come into existence on its own?
If god has existed forever, why couldn't the universe have existed forever?
End of Childhood
Religion is something like father to a child.
Just as children fight each other over whose father is bigger, stronger better etc,
mankind fights over whose religion is better.
Just as a child runs crying to father when it is in distress, mankind runs to
religion or religious heads to solve its troubles when in distress.
Just as a child is disciplined by its parents, mankind was disciplined by religion till now.
Mankind is coming out of childhood and learning to stand on its own feet.
Just as an adult solves his own troubles without running to his/her parents
mankind will start solving its own troubles without running to religion/god.
Is knowledge perishable?
More than 75% of all scientists who were ever alive are alive today.
More than 75% of all knowledge, all discoveries and inventions were made in the
last 50 years.
Is it not a fallacy to think that our ancestors knew more than us, were wiser
than us, lived better than us?
Is it not true that our descendants will know a million things that we will
never even dream of? Do you believe that our descendants will know less than what
we know? Is knowledge perishable? Will our descendants will be less wiser and more
foolish than us? Is civilization regressive or progressive?
So, if our descendants will know more and be more wiser than we are and live
much better off than us, then
is it not also true that we know more and are more wiser and live infinitely
better than our ancestors?
So, if our ancestors knew much less than us; were less wiser than us, doesn't it also mean that dead
prophets knew much lesser than us; were less wiser than us and their dictats become more and more meaningless
as knowledge keeps growing and conditions keep changing?
What are holy books?
Aren't holy books called holy because they have a lot of holes in them? Of course people
who follow these books will never be able to see these holes because all
our so called reasoning is to find arguments to go on believing as we
already do.
This site was last modified on Monday 08th of March 2010 04:46:44 AM